Time and space are the SAME GODDAMN THING! Two ways of looking at the exact same property of life. There simply is no difference between the two. For our limited human senses it is easier to think, view, and explain things in terms of two convenient perspectives (passage of time and movement through space) of the same damn physical phenomenon. Our handicap in this regard is the tendency to view worldly phenomena as static.

A case scenario: Maria Sandoval, a UNLV student, asked Hilary Clinton in the Nov. 15 Democratic presidential debate whether she preferred diamonds or pearls. The five seconds that it took Hilary to give her repulsive answer ("i want both" geez what a harlot) is a convenient perspective that explains the same phenomenon as the perspective that explains the necessary distance in space it took to move the molecules that unfortunately formed together to create Senator Clinton's body and resultant, and regrettable, speaking capability that soiled my ears at that moment.

Think about it. According to Big Bang theory (that is, empirically established scientific fact) the universe is continually expanding in one direction, away from some fixed point. Point A will be some distance further from that point after some time amount. Point A cannot move to its new location without time, and time cannot pass without the movement of point A. Now one can say that they are mutually dependent, or one can be logical and realize they are one in the same thing.

In 1915 Albert Einstein demonstrated his general theory of relativity by elucidating the linkage between space and time through brilliant experiments. You screw with movement in space enough and time starts to change, and vice versa. Thus a time machine, or for that matter, a space machine, would merely reverse the direction of Big Bang expansion, i.e. move the molecules back to their dinosaur forms closer to that original fixed point in space.

Communist